Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Specifically, the court adopted the three-pronged test required for any encroachment of Article 21 right: legality, or the existence of a certain law; necessity, in terms of a legitimate state objective; and proportionality, which requires a rational connection between an object and the means required to get that object.
K. S. Puttaswamy (8 February 1926 – 28 October 2024) was an Indian judge of the Karnataka High Court who was also the original petitioner, challenging the Government of India over making Aadhaar mandatory. [1]
Janhit Abhiyan v. Union of India or EWS Reservation Case. 2022 The legality of the 103rd Amendment of the Constitution, which provides reservation in educational institutes as well as in jobs for the economically weaker sections, was upheld. Supriyo v. Union of India: 2023 The right to marry is a statutory right, not a constitutional right.
The Supreme Court has upheld the validity of the Aadhaar document but with modifications. The unique identity number will now not be needed for opening bank accounts, admissions in schools or for ...
The Delhi court is set to hear the case next in February on the jurisdiction and other arguments. Asked about the lawsuit, Reuters, which holds a 26% interest in ANI, has said it is not involved ...
The Court also referred the petitions claiming Aadhaar was unconstitutional to a Constitutional Bench. [ 159 ] On 19 July 2017, a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court began hearing the arguments on whether there is a fundamental right to privacy. [ 160 ]
They say the U.S. Supreme Court clearly ruled in 1898 in the case United States v. Wong Kim Ark that the 14th Amendment guarantees the right to birthright citizenship regardless of a child's ...
The ADM Jabalpur case was overruled on the doctrinal grounds concerning the rights by the Puttaswamy v. Union of India delivered by a nine judge, constitutional bench of the Supreme court. At the paragraph 119 of the majority opinion the Court had ruled: [4]