Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Rotten Tomatoes logo. On the review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, a film has a rating of 100% if each professional review recorded by the website is assessed as positive rather than negative. The percentage is based on the film's reviews aggregated by the website and assessed as positive or negative, and when all aggregated reviews are ...
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 21 February 2025. American review aggregator for film and television Rotten Tomatoes Screenshot Rotten Tomatoes's homepage as of April 1, 2021 Type of site Film and television review aggregator and user community Country of origin United States Owner Warner Bros. Discovery (25%) Comcast (75%) Founder(s ...
Margaret Pomeranz (At the Movies) Dilys Powell (The Sunday Times) Vasiraju Prakasam (Vaartha) Nathan Rabin (The A.V. Club) Rex Reed (New York Observer) B. Ruby Rich (Film Quarterly) Frank Rich (Time, New York) Carrie Rickey (Philadelphia Inquirer) Shirrel Rhoades; Richard Roeper (Chicago Sun-Times, At the Movies with Ebert & Roeper) Jonathan ...
Science & Tech. Shopping. Sports
7. A League of Their Own (1992) Rotten Tomatoes Score: 81% IMDb Score: 7.3 When World War II breaks out, so many men ended up fighting overseas that it gutted things like Major League Baseball ...
However, if Rotten Tomatoes has a sample of 10 reviews for an independent film, the sample is not large enough for the score to be statistically accurate. Top Critics in Rotten Tomatoes: The "Top Critics" section on Rotten Tomatoes is a smaller sample size and may be statistically inaccurate. The section's overall score may also differ ...
Inside the scandal rocking the review aggregator. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
On review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, the film has a 70% rating based on reviews from 10 critics, and an average rating of 5.80/10. [5] On the website Movie Nation, critic Roger Moore gave the film an unfavorable review, calling it a "tight but illogical skips-a step-or-three thriller". [6]