enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Logical reasoning - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_reasoning

   A variety of basic concepts is used in the study and analysis of logical reasoning. Logical reasoning happens by inferring a conclusion from a set of premises. [3] Premises and conclusions are normally seen as propositions. A proposition is a statement that makes a claim about what is the case.

3. List of valid argument forms - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_valid_argument_forms

   In this form, you start with the same first premise as with modus ponens. However, the second part of the premise is denied, leading to the conclusion that the first part of the premise should be denied as well. It is shown below in logical form. If A, then B Not B Therefore not A. [3] When modus tollens is used with actual content, it looks ...

4. Premise - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premise

   A premise or premiss [a] is a proposition—a true or false declarative statement—used in an argument to prove the truth of another proposition called the conclusion. [1] Arguments consist of a set of premises and a conclusion. An argument is meaningful for its conclusion only when all of its premises are true. If one or more premises are ...

5. Glossary of logic - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_logic

   A symbol or word used in logic to connect propositions or sentences, forming more complex expressions that convey relationships such as conjunction, disjunction, and negation. logical consequence A relationship between statements where the truth of one or more premises necessitates the truth of a conclusion, based on the logical structure of ...

6. Begging the question - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question

   Historically, begging the question refers to a fault in a dialectical argument in which the speaker assumes some premise that has not been demonstrated to be true. In modern usage, it has come to refer to an argument in which the premises assume the conclusion without supporting it. This makes it an example of circular reasoning. [1] [2]

7. Inference - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inference

   That is, the word "valid" does not refer to the truth of the premises or the conclusion, but rather to the form of the inference. An inference can be valid even if the parts are false, and can be invalid even if some parts are true. But a valid form with true premises will always have a true conclusion.