Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In the early 1990s a new theory of appeasement, sometimes called "counter-revisionist", [81] emerged as historians argued that appeasement was probably the only choice for the British government in the 1930s but that it was poorly implemented, carried out too late and not enforced strongly enough to constrain Hitler. Appeasement was considered ...
In 1938, Winston Churchill was a backbench MP who had been out of government office since 1929. He was the Conservative member for Epping.From the mid-1930s, alarmed by developments in Germany, he had consistently emphasised the necessity of rearmament and the buildup of national defences, especially the Royal Air Force.
The foreign policy of British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain has become inextricably linked with the events of the Munich Crisis. The policy of appeasement and Chamberlain's delusionary announcement of a Peace for our time has resonated through the following decades as a parable of diplomatic failure.
Why England Slept (1940) is the published version of a thesis written by John F. Kennedy in his senior year at Harvard College.Its title alludes to Winston Churchill's 1938 book Arms and the Covenant, published in the United States as While England Slept, which also examined the buildup of German power. [1]
The way in which big corporations and the very, very wealthy are tied to government policies, that’s very Gilded Age. That’s one of the greatest parallels between the two periods right now.
“Choice” means just that: A pregnant woman or a schoolchild’s parents may choose what they think is best for themselves and their own family. 'Choice' means government doesn't decide. That's ...
US government-backed efforts to evacuate human rights defenders or move them to safe houses are in jeopardy, she added. Some autocratic governments, like Russia, have welcomed the USAID cuts.
Politically the coalition government headed by Lloyd George, a Liberal, depended primarily on Conservative Party support. He increasingly antagonized his dwindling base of Liberals supporters by working mostly with Conservatives, and he antagonized his main base of Conservative supporters by foreign policy miscues.