enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Miranda warning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_warning

    In the United States, the Miranda warning is a type of notification customarily given by police to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a custodial interrogation) advising them of their right to silence and, in effect, protection from self-incrimination; that is, their right to refuse to answer questions or provide information to law enforcement or other officials.

  3. Prophylactic rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophylactic_rule

    In United States law, an example is the case of Miranda v. Arizona , which adopted a prophylactic rule (" Miranda warnings ") to protect the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. The exclusionary rule , which restricts admissibility of evidence in court, is also sometimes considered to be a prophylactic rule. [ 2 ]

  4. Portal:Law/Selected cases/21 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Law/Selected_cases/21

    Miranda v. Arizona , 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that law enforcement in the United States must warn a person of their constitutional rights before interrogating them, or else the person's statements cannot be used as evidence at their trial .

  5. Chavez v. Martinez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chavez_v._Martinez

    Chavez v. Martinez, 538 U.S. 760 (2003), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court, which held that a police officer does not deprive a suspect of constitutional rights by failing to issue a Miranda warning. However, the court held open the possibility that the right to substantive due process could be violated in certain egregious ...

  6. Category:Miranda warning case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Miranda_warning...

    Download QR code; Print/export Download as PDF; Printable version; ... Help. Pages in category "Miranda warning case law" The following 26 pages are in this category ...

  7. Supreme Court set to rule on whether Miranda warnings are a ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-set-rule-whether...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  8. United States v. Patane - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Patane

    In a decision without a majority opinion, three justices wrote that the Miranda warnings were merely intended to prevent violations of the Constitution, and that because Patane's un-Mirandized testimony was not admitted at trial, the Constitution (specifically the Fifth Amendment's protection against self-incrimination) had not been violated.

  9. Los Angeles police dispute at center of Supreme Court case on ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-sounds-ready...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us