enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Baker v. Carr - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baker_v._Carr

    Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question under the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause, thus enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth Amendment-based redistricting cases.

  3. One man, one vote - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_man,_one_vote

    However, in Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962) the United States Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren overturned the previous decision in Colegrove holding that malapportionment claims under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment were not exempt from judicial review under Article IV, Section 4, as the equal protection ...

  4. Political question - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_question

    The leading Supreme Court case in the area of the political question doctrine is Baker v. Carr (1962). [5] [4] In that case, the Supreme Court held that an unequal apportionment of a state legislature may have denied equal protection and presented a justiciable issue. [4] In the Baker opinion, the Court outlined six characteristics "[p]rominent ...

  5. Reynolds v. Sims - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_v._Sims

    Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the electoral districts of state legislative chambers must be roughly equal in population. Along with Baker v. Carr (1962) and Wesberry v.

  6. Felix Frankfurter - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felix_Frankfurter

    In Baker v. Carr, Frankfurter's position was that the federal courts did not have the right to tell sovereign state governments how to apportion their legislatures; he thought the Supreme Court should not get involved in political questions, whether federal or local. [60] Frankfurter's view had won out in the 1946 case preceding Baker, Colegrove v.

  7. Rucho v. Common Cause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rucho_v._Common_Cause

    Rucho v. Common Cause, No. 18-422, 588 U.S. 684 (2019) is a landmark case of the United States Supreme Court concerning partisan gerrymandering. [1] The Court ruled that while partisan gerrymandering may be "incompatible with democratic principles", the federal courts cannot review such allegations, as they present nonjusticiable political questions outside the jurisdiction of these courts.

  8. Colorado justices consider a pink and blue cake's meaning in ...

    www.aol.com/news/colorado-supreme-court-hear...

    From plain white cakes to rainbow-colored ones, the Colorado Supreme Court considered a variety of hypothetical cake-design scenarios Tuesday as it heard arguments in the case of a Christian baker ...

  9. William J. Brennan Jr. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_J._Brennan_Jr.

    New York City. William Joseph Brennan Jr. (April 25, 1906 – July 24, 1997) was an American lawyer and jurist who served as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1956 to 1990. He was the seventh-longest serving justice in Supreme Court history, and was known for being a leader of the Court's liberal wing.