Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Ad personam and ad hominem are distinct. The former is a personal attack, unrelated to the subject matter of the debate, which aims to discredit the person of the opponent regardless of his arguments; the latter focuses on the argumentation, reasoning or behavior of the opponent in relation to the subject matter of the debate, rather than directly on the subject matter of the debate itself.
Often said of or used by politicians. Likewise, an argumentum ad captandum is an argument designed to please the crowd. ad clerum: to the clergy: Formal letter or communication in the Christian tradition from a bishop to his clergy. An ad clerum may be an encouragement in a time of celebration or a technical explanation of new regulations or ...
Ad personam; Argumentum a fortiori; Argumentum ad antiquitatem; Argumentum ad baculum; Argumentum ad captandum; Argumentum ad consequentiam; Argumentum ad crumenam; Argumentum ad ignorantiam; Argumentum ad lapidem; Argumentum ad lazarum; Argumentum ad logicam; Argumentum ad misericordiam; Argumentum ad novitatem; Argumentum ad populum ...
A solis ortu usque ad occasum; Ab urbe condita; Acta Apostolicae Sedis; Acta Croatica; Acta Diurna; Acta Senatus; Ad astra; Ad beatissimi Apostolorum; Ad eundem; Ad fontes; Ad hoc; Ad hominem; Ad honorem; Ad infinitum; Ad libitum; Ad maiorem Dei gloriam; Ad metalla; Ad nauseam; Ad orientem; Ad personam; Ad quod damnum; Ad sectam; Ad utrumque ...
Argumentum ad personam. Add languages. Add links. ... Upload file; Special pages; ... Get shortened URL; Download QR code; Print/export Download as PDF; Printable ...
Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, refers to several types of arguments that are usually fallacious.Often currently this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than the substance of the argument itself.
A poisoned-well "argument" can also be in this form: [3] Unfavorable definitions (be it true or false) that prevent disagreement (or enforce affirmative position). Any claims without first agreeing with the above definitions are automatically dismissed. Example: Boss, you heard my side of the story, and why I think Bill should be fired and not me.
Reductio ad absurdum, painting by John Pettie exhibited at the Royal Academy in 1884. In logic, reductio ad absurdum (Latin for "reduction to absurdity"), also known as argumentum ad absurdum (Latin for "argument to absurdity") or apagogical argument, is the form of argument that attempts to establish a claim by showing that the opposite scenario would lead to absurdity or contradiction.