Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Constantin Carathéodory's alternative definition of the differentiability of a function can be used to give an elegant proof of the chain rule. [6] Under this definition, a function f is differentiable at a point a if and only if there is a function q, continuous at a and such that f(x) − f(a) = q(x)(x − a).
This rule allows one to express a joint probability in terms of only conditional probabilities. [4] The rule is notably used in the context of discrete stochastic processes and in applications, e.g. the study of Bayesian networks, which describe a probability distribution in terms of conditional probabilities.
A Markov chain is a type of Markov process that has either a discrete state space or a discrete index set (often representing time), but the precise definition of a Markov chain varies. [6] For example, it is common to define a Markov chain as a Markov process in either discrete or continuous time with a countable state space (thus regardless ...
The chain rule has a particularly elegant statement in terms of total derivatives. ... pp. 217–220 For example, a simple supply-demand system might specify the ...
Chain rule Suppose that f : A → R is a real-valued function defined on a subset A of R n, and that f is differentiable at a point a. There are two forms of the chain rule applying to the gradient. First, suppose that the function g is a parametric curve; that is, a function g : I → R n maps a subset I ⊂ R into R n.
[citation needed] One author uses the terminology of the "Rule of Average Conditional Probabilities", [4] while another refers to it as the "continuous law of alternatives" in the continuous case. [5] This result is given by Grimmett and Welsh [6] as the partition theorem, a name that they also give to the related law of total expectation.
Upgrade to a faster, more secure version of a supported browser. It's free and it only takes a few moments:
Suppose a function f(x, y, z) = 0, where x, y, and z are functions of each other. Write the total differentials of the variables = + = + Substitute dy into dx = [() + ()] + By using the chain rule one can show the coefficient of dx on the right hand side is equal to one, thus the coefficient of dz must be zero () + = Subtracting the second term and multiplying by its inverse gives the triple ...