Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Gang of Roses is a 2003 Western action drama film written and directed by Jean-Claude La Marre. [1] It starred Monica Calhoun, Lil' Kim, LisaRaye, Charity Hill, Bobby Brown, Stacey Dash and Marie Matiko. The movie took just 18 days to film. [2] The film followed by a sequel, Gang of Roses II: Next Generation (2012).
The educational movie ratings, which have since been abolished, were: -7 – Targeted at children younger than 7 years. 7+ – Appropriate for children older than 7 years. 12+ – Appropriate for people 12 years and over. 15+ – Appropriate for people 15 years and over. New content descriptors and icons were added including: Sex; Nudity (Nahota)
The film rating system has had a number of high-profile critics. Film critic Roger Ebert called for replacing the NC-17 rating with separate ratings for pornographic and non-pornographic adult film. [87] Ebert argued that the system places too much emphasis on sex, while allowing the portrayal of massive amounts of gruesome violence.
Read more:The 27 best movie theaters in Los Angeles Eusebio has fun with his leading man’s diminutive size. At his full height, Quan seems barely taller than some foes on their knees.
Gang of Roses: Baby Face Malone 2004 Nora's Hair Salon: Devin 2004 Sugar Valentine: Sugar Valentine 2005 Go for Broke 2: Mouse 2005 County General: Craig 2005 Brothers in Arms: Slim 2005 Ride or Die: Lucky 2005 Pastor Jones: Pastor Jones / Grandpa Slick Direct-to-video 2006 VooDoo Curse: The Giddeh: Tribal Leader 2006
This page was last edited on 22 December 2022, at 13:51 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.
[11] Olie Coen of DVD Talk rated it 1.5/5 stars and wrote, "I can't recommend this movie to anyone, unless you just want to see Snipes pretending he's a cowboy." [ 12 ] Andrew Dowler of Now wrote, "With some okay action and spectacular scenery, Gallowwalkers starts strong, sags in the middle, suffers from some narrative incoherence and comes ...
Rotten Tomatoes gives the film a 19% rating based on reviews from 16 critics. [4] Roger Ebert gave it 2 stars out of 4, calling the main characters "sad sacks." [2] Conversely, his on-screen partner Gene Siskel conceded that the film, while a bit odd, contained some touching moments. He awarded the film three stars.