Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In the United States, the Miranda warning is a type of notification customarily given by police to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a custodial interrogation) advising them of their right to silence and, in effect, protection from self-incrimination; that is, their right to refuse to answer questions or provide information to law enforcement or other officials.
Applying the exclusionary rule to violations of the Miranda rights Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill: 470 U.S. 532 (1985) Due process right of public employees to be heard before termination Winston v. Lee: 470 U.S. 753 (1985) Compelled surgical intrusion into an individual's body for evidence violates suspect's Fourth Amendment rights ...
Miranda, 459 U.S. 14 (1982) Landon v. Plasencia, 459 U.S. 21 (1982) Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983) Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Phinpathya, 464 U.S. 183 (1984) Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Delgado, 466 U.S. 210 (1984) Bernal v. Fainter, 467 U.S. 216 (1984) Immigration and ...
On Thursday, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Carlos Vega v. Terence B. Tekoh that a plaintiff may not sue a police officer for obtaining an improper admission of an “un-Mirandized ...
Wainwright v. Greenfield, 474 U.S. 284 (1986), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court reversed the lower court's finding and overturned the petitioner's conviction, on the grounds that it was fundamentally unfair for the prosecutor to comment during the court proceedings on the petitioner's silence invoked as a result of a Miranda warning.
Martinez, 538 U.S. 760 (2003), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court, which held that a police officer does not deprive a suspect of constitutional rights by failing to issue a Miranda warning. However, the court held open the possibility that the right to substantive due process could be violated in certain egregious circumstances ...
The Self-Incrimination Clause of the Fifth Amendment does not require the suppression of a confession, made after proper Miranda warnings and a valid waiver of rights, solely because the police had obtained an earlier voluntary but unwarned admission from the suspect. Court membership; Chief Justice Warren E. Burger Associate Justices
In the United States, Miranda warnings were established from the Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona and upheld in Dickerson v. United States, establishing that under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, statements made by a suspect while both in police custody and directly being questioned cannot be used as evidence in trial unless they were notified of their rights to ...