Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The speech was "a solemn moment in a decidedly unsolemn time", warning a nation "giddy with prosperity, infatuated with youth and glamour, and aiming increasingly for the easy life." [ 4 ] As we peer into society's future, we – you and I, and our government – must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering for our own ease and ...
Oct. 22—Everywhere Jessica Ellis goes, she keeps a tiny nasal spray canister in a pocket of her purse. Packaged in plastic and foil, the device weighs no more than 2 ounces. But, if administered ...
She argued that her political rival’s comment on Liz Cheney has the potential to impact the standing of the U.S. globally because leaders should instead talk about the importance of democracy ...
Put a group of women together and the conversation will eventually be about men. Put a group of men together and they will not talk about women at all, they will just talk about their own stuff. We women should spend about 20 percent of our time on men, because it's fun, but otherwise we should also be talking about our own stuff." [6] [7]
Patton delivered the speech without notes, and so though it was substantially the same at each occurrence, the order of some of its parts varied. [21] One notable difference occurred in the speech he delivered on 31 May 1944, while addressing the U.S. 6th Armored Division, when he began with a remark that would later be among his most famous: [22]
Many of his friends do the same. If companies don’t want to train them, they’ll train themselves. Rejection can go both ways. More news below. Diane Brady diane.brady@fortune.com Follow on ...
The cover of The Peter Principle (1970 Pan Books edition). The Peter principle is a concept in management developed by Laurence J. Peter which observes that people in a hierarchy tend to rise to "a level of respective incompetence": employees are promoted based on their success in previous jobs until they reach a level at which they are no longer competent, as skills in one job do not ...
It should not be confused with the amount of value per object, although the latter may vary too, e.g. because of instrumental value conditionality. For example, taking a fictional life-stance of accepting waffle-eating as being the end-in-itself, the intensity may be the speed that waffles are eaten, and is zero when no waffles are eaten, e.g ...