enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Stanford v. Kentucky - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_v._Kentucky

    This decision came one year after Thompson v. Oklahoma , in which the Court had held that a 15-year-old offender could not be executed because to do so would constitute cruel and unusual punishment. In 2003, the Governor of Kentucky Paul E. Patton commuted the death sentence of Kevin Stanford, an action followed by the Supreme Court two years ...

  3. Blakely v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blakely_v._Washington

    Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), held that, in the context of mandatory sentencing guidelines under state law, the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial prohibited judges from enhancing criminal sentences based on facts other than those decided by the jury or admitted by the defendant.

  4. List of United States Supreme Court opinions involving ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Sumner v. Shuman, 483 U.S. 66 (1987) – Mandatory death penalty for a prison inmate who is convicted of murder while serving a life sentence without possibility of parole is unconstitutional. Kennedy v. Louisiana, 554 U.S. 407 (2008) – The death penalty is unconstitutional for child rape and other non-homicidal crimes against the person.

  5. Apprendi v. New Jersey - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apprendi_v._New_Jersey

    Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision with regard to aggravating factors in crimes. The Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial, incorporated against the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, prohibited judges from enhancing criminal sentences beyond statutory maxima based on facts other than those decided by the ...

  6. United States v. Booker - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Booker

    The second, the one the Court ultimately adopted, made the Guidelines advisory while at the same time "maintaining a strong connection between the sentence imposed and the offender's real conduct — a connection important to the increased uniformity of sentencing that Congress intended its Guidelines system to achieve."

  7. Jan. 6 convict receives shorter sentence in case that may lay ...

    www.aol.com/news/jan-6-convict-seeks-shorter...

    Robertson sought to reduce his sentence based on two decisions: the Fischer case at the Supreme Court and a case called Brock in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

  8. Atkins v. Virginia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atkins_v._Virginia

    Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled 6–3 that executing people with intellectual disabilities violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishments, but that states can define who has an intellectual disability.

  9. Finnegans Wake - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finnegans_Wake

    Joyce himself revealed that the book "ends in the middle of a sentence and begins in the middle of the same sentence." [ 31 ] The introductory chapter (I.1) establishes the book's setting as " Howth Castle and Environs" (i.e. the Dublin area), and introduces Dublin hod carrier " Finnegan ", who falls to his death from a ladder while ...