Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
On this page, environmental lawsuit means "a lawsuit where the well-being of an environmental asset or the well-being of a set of environmental assets is in dispute". Also on this page, lawsuit with environmental relevance means "a lawsuit where a non-environmental entity or a set of non-environmental entities is in dispute, but whose outcome has relevance for an environmental asset or for a ...
The arbitrators of the case, by a majority, decided in favour of Mercator. They held that the loss from getting a lower price on the next chartering contract was within the first rule in Hadley v Baxendale [3] as arising "naturally, i.e. according to the usual course of things, from such breach of contract itself".
Pages in category "Arbitration cases" The following 36 pages are in this category, out of 36 total. ... Transfield Shipping Inc v Mercator Shipping Inc; Treaty of ...
As to (i), the Court decided that the wording of the arbitration clauses was of little or no materiality: (a) even if the parties only intended to arbitrate disputes between the parties, that was entirely consistent with a mutual intention that Cleaves should be obliged to enforce the substantive term through the courts; (b) if, on the proper ...
This is a chronological list of World Trade Organization dispute settlement cases. As of December 2024, there have been 631 such cases. [1] List. This list ...
Greece v United Kingdom [1952] ICJ 1 (also called the Ambatielos Case) is a public international law case, concerning state responsibility for economic damage. The International Court of Justice held that the UK had to enter into arbitration under the terms of a treaty it had made with Greece, although the ICJ itself held it had no jurisdiction to hear and decide upon the substantive dispute ...
Hyundai were shipbuilders who entered into a contract dated 10 April 1972 with North Ocean Shipping to build an oil tanker named the "Atlantic Baron". [1] The price for constructing the ship was payable in five instalments, and the builders had agreed to a reverse letter of credit, for repayment of installments in the event of default on the construction.
B. Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA v Ali; Barry v Davies; Bates & Others v Post Office Ltd; Bell v Lever Brothers Ltd; Berezovsky v Abramovich