Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In the history of motion pictures in the United States, many films have been set in New York City, or a fictionalized version thereof. The following is a list of films and documentaries set in New York, however the list includes a number of films which only have a tenuous connection to the city. The list is sorted by the year the film was released.
King of New York, 1990; Paris Is Burning, 1990; Reversal of Fortune, 1990 (City College of New York in Harlem, was used to depict Harvard University.) Strictly Business, 1991; A Rage in Harlem, 1991; New Jack City, 1991; Jungle Fever, 1991; Juice, 1992; Who's the Man?, 1993; Sugar Hill, 1994; Above the Rim, 1994; A Great Day in Harlem, 1994
2 Days in New York; 2by4; 3 Generations (film) 4.3.2.1. The 4th Floor (1999 film) 5 Flights Up; 5 to 7; 9½ Weeks; 10 Hours of Walking in NYC as a Woman; 10 Rules for Sleeping Around; 13 (2010 film) 13 Going on 30; 13: The Musical; 15 Minutes; 21 Bridges; The 24 Hour Woman; 27 Dresses; 30 Days (1999 film).45 (film) 1408 (film) 1990: The Bronx ...
This page was last edited on 11 February 2023, at 10:32 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.
The Bleecker Street Cinema was an art house movie theater located at 144 Bleecker Street in Manhattan, New York City, New York. It became a landmark of Greenwich Village and an influential venue for filmmakers and cinephiles through its screenings of foreign and independent films. It closed in 1990, reopened as a gay adult theater for a short ...
This is a list of hood films.These films focus on the culture and life of African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans, and, in some cases, Asian-Americans or White Americans who live in segregated, low-income urban communities.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
On Rotten Tomatoes the film has an approval rating of 25% based on reviews from 8 critics. [2] [3] The New York Times critic praised the director James DeMonaco for "adroitly weaving violence, absurdity and sentiment, even an environmental consciousness, into a modest, appealing fable", [4] while the reviewer from The New York Daily News blamed him for "wasting a strong cast in silly roles".