enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Oppenheimer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Oppenheimer

    Under the Criminal Appeals Act of March 2, 1907, c. 2564, 34 Stat. 1246, the right to review decisions and judgments sustaining special pleas in bar is not limited to cases in which the decisions or judgments are based upon the invalidity or construction of the statutes upon which the indictments are founded. [3]

  3. Henderson v Henderson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henderson_v_Henderson

    The plea of res judicata applies, except in special cases, not only to points upon which the Court was actually required by the parties to form an opinion and pronounce a judgment, but to every point which properly belonged to the subject of litigation, and which the parties, exercising reasonable diligence, might have brought forward at the time.

  4. Res judicata - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Res_judicata

    Angelo Gambiglioni, De re iudicata, 1579 Res judicata or res iudicata, also known as claim preclusion, is the Latin term for judged matter, [1] and refers to either of two concepts in common law civil procedure: a case in which there has been a final judgment and that is no longer subject to appeal; and the legal doctrine meant to bar (or preclude) relitigation of a claim between the same parties.

  5. High court rejects Ohio killer's last-minute plea - AOL

    www.aol.com/article/2014/01/15/high-court...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. Closing arguments to begin in case of ex-Ohio deputy ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/closing-arguments-begin-case-ex...

    The jury in the murder trial of a former Franklin County Sheriff's deputy for the December 2020 shooting death of a Black man will soon begin deliberating.. Closing arguments will begin Wednesday ...

  7. Collateral estoppel - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collateral_estoppel

    Collateral estoppel (CE), known in modern terminology as issue preclusion, is a common law estoppel doctrine that prevents a person from relitigating an issue. One summary is that, "once a court has decided an issue of fact or law necessary to its judgment, that decision ... preclude[s] relitigation of the issue in a suit on a different cause of action involving a party to the first case". [1]

  8. Lis alibi pendens - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lis_alibi_pendens

    Reinisch, August. (2004). "The Use and Limits of Res Judicata and Lis Pendens as Procedural Tools to Avoid Conflicting Dispute Settlement Outcomes", 3 The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals pp. 37–77. Schutze, Rolf A. (2002) "Lis Pendens and Related Actions". 4(1) European Journal of Law Reform p. 57. Seatzu. F. (1999).

  9. Peremptory plea - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peremptory_plea

    The plea of autrefois acquit is a form of estoppel by which the state cannot reassert the guilt of the accused after they have been acquitted. [3] The plea prevents inconsistent decisions and the reopening of litigation. [3] The limitations of these pleas have been circumscribed by various legal cases and appeals. [4]