Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Depth-first search (DFS) is an algorithm for traversing or searching tree or graph data structures. The algorithm starts at the root node (selecting some arbitrary node as the root node in the case of a graph) and explores as far as possible along each branch before backtracking.
Breadth-first search (BFS) is an algorithm for searching a tree data structure for a node that satisfies a given property. It starts at the tree root and explores all nodes at the present depth prior to moving on to the nodes at the next depth level.
In the paper, [4] the authors develop a new data structure called bag-structure. Bag structure is constructed from the pennant data structure. A pennant is a tree of 2 k nodex, where k is a nonnegative integer. Each root x in this tree contains two pointers x.left and x.right to its children.
By contrast, a breadth-first search will never reach the grandchildren, as it seeks to exhaust the children first. A more sophisticated analysis of running time can be given via infinite ordinal numbers ; for example, the breadth-first search of the depth 2 tree above will take ω ·2 steps: ω for the first level, and then another ω for the ...
A breadth-first search (BFS) is another technique for traversing a finite graph. BFS visits the sibling vertices before visiting the child vertices, and a queue is used in the search process. This algorithm is often used to find the shortest path from one vertex to another.
IDDFS achieves breadth-first search's completeness (when the branching factor is finite) using depth-first search's space-efficiency. If a solution exists, it will find a solution path with the fewest arcs. [2] Iterative deepening visits states multiple times, and it may seem wasteful.
But what Russell and Norvig do is generalize the "true DFS", rather than BFS, so their BFS is "DFS with a queue instead of a stack" rather than the other way around. So the current statement of the difference in the article is confusing for AIMA readers, since it presumes a particular version of BFS. QVVERTYVS 20:10, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
BFS will always find the path that has the fewest number of nodes which just happens to be the shortest path if all weights are the same. You certainly can modify BFS to use a priority queue instead of a normal queue so that it then really finds a shortest path. But then DFS is the same as BFS just with a stack instead of a queue.