enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. WA homelessness bill 'flies in the face' of SCOTUS ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/wa-homelessness-bill-flies-face...

    (The Center Square) – While nearly 75% of the city voted to outlaw camping within 1,000 feet of a school, park and daycare in 2023, Spokane’s state legislators are now pushing to allow ...

  3. Citizens United v. FEC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

  4. Supreme Court ruling on homelessness leads the way for ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-ruling-homelessness...

    The U.S. Supreme Court's ruling Friday that will allow cities to ban public camping will bolster Florida's recent move to hold local municipalities accountable for their homeless populations.. The ...

  5. US Supreme Court scrutinizes anti-camping laws used ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/us-supreme-court-eyes-anti...

    U.S. Supreme Court justices confronted the nation's homelessness crisis on Monday as they wrestled with the legality of local laws used against people who camp on public streets and parks in a ...

  6. Martin v. Boise - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_v._Boise

    Martin v. Boise (full case name Robert Martin, Lawrence Lee Smith, Robert Anderson, Janet F. Bell, Pamela S. Hawkes, and Basil E. Humphrey v.City of Boise) was a 2018 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit regarding anti-camping ordinances targeting homeless people, effectively overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2024.

  7. With homelessness on the rise, the Supreme Court weighs bans ...

    www.aol.com/news/homelessness-rise-supreme-court...

    The Supreme Court wrestled with major questions about the growing issue of homelessness on Monday as it considered whether cities can punish people for sleeping outside when shelter space is lacking.

  8. Bostock v. Clayton County - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bostock_v._Clayton_County

    Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court civil rights decision in which the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees against discrimination because of sexuality or gender identity.

  9. Editorial: The Supreme Court cannot allow homelessness ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/editorial-supreme-court-cannot...

    Liberal and conservative justices seemed to grasp the cruelty and futility of fining or jailing people simply for sleeping outdoors when there aren't enough shelters.