Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In the United States the "American rule" is generally followed, each party bearing its own expense of litigation. However, 35 U.S.C. § 285 provides that in patent cases, the losing party may have to pay attorney fees of the winning party if the case is deemed "exceptional."
Attorney's fees (or attorneys' fees, depending upon number of attorneys involved, or simplified to attorney fees) are the fees, including labor charges and costs, charged by lawyers or their firms for legal services provided by them to their clients. They do not include incidental and non-legal costs (e.g., expedited shipping costs for legal ...
[5] 28 U.S.C. § 1927 authorizes federal courts to award attorneys' fees and expenses against any attorney who unreasonably and vexatiously multiplies a proceeding. Federal courts also possess inherent authority to assess attorney’s fees and litigation costs against a plaintiff who has acted in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly or for ...
The settlement comes the same day that closing arguments were scheduled to begin in a trial on Singular Computing's lawsuit, which had sought $1.67 billion in damages for Google's alleged misuse ...
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 572 U.S. 545 (2014), [1] is one of two U.S. Supreme Court decisions issued on April 29, 2014 regarding patent lawsuit fee-shifting (the other case being Highmark v. Allcare Health). [2] The Supreme Court essentially made it easier for courts to make the loser pay for all attorney costs if the lawsuit is regarded as ...
The court found that Google used this monopoly power to raise prices on its search text ads between 5% and 15% to reach its revenue targets without losing customers to competitors.
Google was hit with a wide-ranging lawsuit on Tuesday alleging the tech giant scraped data from millions of users without their consent and violated copyright laws in order to train and develop ...
Schmidt said Google would have paid for that license, but they were concerned that Sun had also requested some shared control of Android along with the fee. [10] [11] [12] Google states that they wanted more control in order to open source the language and allow third parties to take better advantage of its code; [10] Oracle states that Sun ...