Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Donald Trump and appointees to his second administration argued the Impoundment Control Act is unconstitutional, though few legal scholars agree. [11] Trump's assertion of this power resulted in the 2025 United States federal government grant pause, which was put on hold by a preliminary court injunction before it took effect.
While past presidents have tried to impound -- or hold back -- federal funding in specific cases, Trump's directive to indefinitely freeze financial assistance, grants and loans and foreign aid ...
But Trump also views his ability to impound congressionally appropriated funds as his constitutional right and believes that the court’s decision in Trump v. U.S. grants him that authority.
In a case that preceded the passage of the Impoundment Control Act, the Supreme Court ruled in Train v. City of New York in 1975 that presidents cannot impound funds authorized by Congress unless ...
Prakash noted that Trump could refuse to spend the agency’s foreign-aid funds, but doing so would likely conflict with the Impoundment Control Act of 1974, a Nixon-era federal law that requires ...
How Donald Trump could try to use presidential impoundment to cut federal spending.
The court unanimously held that the law gave Nixon no power to impound funds appropriated by federal statute. ... It is imperative that a federal court quickly find Trump’s huge impoundment of ...
Impoundment, DeLauro said, has already been litigated in the courts in past decades: “Let me be clear that nowhere does the Constitution give the president unilateral power to impound funds ...