Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The drugmaker has settled a series of lawsuits related to Zantac over the past 12 months, including several in California. California is generally seen as a more challenging legal environment for ...
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2020 pulled Zantac and its generic versions off the market, triggering a wave of lawsuits. The drug, approved over four decades ago, was the world's ...
For example, in Railway Executives, the need to discover the cause of railway accidents justified the drug testing, and in Acton it was the need to promote a drug-free school environment. In this case, however, the very reason for the policy was to use the threat of arrest to motivate the women to abstain from using cocaine.
GSK on Wednesday said it agreed to settle another lawsuit in California alleging its discontinued heartburn drug Zantac caused cancer, as the British drugmaker sought to end costly litigation that ...
The FRA also adopted regulations that authorized railroads to administer breath and urine drug tests to employees who violated safety rules. The Railway Labor Executives' Association , an umbrella group of railway trade unions , sued to have the regulations declared an unconstitutional violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States ...
The Los Angeles Times headlined "Public Faces Overdose of Similar Drug Names." [14] The market for Zantac [15] and its competitors was described in 2005 as 13.5 billion US dollars. [16] The product's problem was described by The New York Times as being "that a potential cancer-causing contaminant can build up in the drug when stored for long ...
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2020 pulled all brands named Zantac and generic versions of the drug off the market, triggering a wave of lawsuits. The drug, approved over four decades ...
In a 4-3 majority decision by Associate Justice Stanley Mosk, the court decided to impose a new kind of liability, known as market share liability.The doctrine evolved from a line of negligence and strict products liability opinions (most of which had been decided by the Supreme Court of California) that were being adopted as the majority rule in many U.S. states.