enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Moore v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore_v._Regents_of_the...

    Regents of the University of California was a landmark Supreme Court of California decision. Filed on July 9, 1990, it dealt with the issue of property rights to one's own cells taken in samples by doctors or researchers. In 1976, John Moore was treated for hairy cell leukemia by physician David Golde, a cancer researcher at the UCLA Medical ...

  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol-Myers_Squibb_Co._v...

    Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that California courts lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant on claims brought by plaintiffs who are not California residents and did not suffer their alleged injury in California. [1]

  4. Chapman v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chapman_v._California

    Chapman and Teale were charged with murder, robbery, and kidnapping, and a joint trial was held April 16, 1963. [3] The prosecution's evidence included traces of Adcock's blood found on both defendants' clothes, paint inside their car that likely came from Adcock's shoes, and witnesses who said they'd seen them that night (e.g. at the Spot Club). [3]

  5. List of overruled United States Supreme Court decisions

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_overruled_United...

    This is a list of decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States that have been explicitly overruled, in part or in whole, by a subsequent decision of the Court. It does not include decisions that have been abrogated by subsequent constitutional amendment or by subsequent amending statutes.

  6. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  7. Buck v. Bell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buck_v._Bell

    Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court, written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., in which the Court ruled that a state statute permitting compulsory sterilization of the unfit, including the intellectually disabled, "for the protection and health of the state" did not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the ...

  8. New reporting on Supreme Court corruption has reignited calls for a code of conduct to be instituted for the justices. The Washington Post reported Thursday evening that tens of thousands of ...

  9. Appeals court does not block US mandate to cover cancer ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/appeals-court-does-not-block...

    (Reuters) -A U.S. appeals court on Friday refused to block a federal mandate requiring health insurers to cover preventive care services like cancer screenings and HIV-preventing medication at no ...