Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Earlier Full Court decisions are available as part of the FCA Series Federal Circuit Court of Australia: Neutral citation: FCCA: 2013-AustLII. BarNet JADE. Federal Magistrates Court of Australia: Neutral citation: FMCA: 2000-2013: AustLII. BarNet JADE. Family law decisions are in the FMCAfam series Family Court of Australia: Neutral citation ...
AustLII content is publicly available legal information. Its primary source information includes legislation, treaties and decisions of courts and tribunals.It also hosts secondary legal materials, including law reform and royal commission reports, as well as legal journals. [5]
R v Federal Court of Australia; Ex parte W.A. National Football League: 1979 143 CLR 190 Barwick: 345 Aka Adamson's Case Decided that a "trading and financial" corporation (a pl.(xx) entity) could be more than just a corporation set up for the purpose of trade, as long as its current revenue included a significant proportion of trading activities
This citation refers to the case entitled Coleman v Power, which was the 39th decision published by the High Court of Australia in 2004. Both forms of citation (parallel citations) may be used so that users can access the case from different sources: [6] Coleman v Power [2004] HCA 39; (2004) 220 CLR 1
First successful native title claim in south-eastern Australia 2007: Silberberg v The Builders Collective of Australia Inc: Liability of Internet forum operators for racial vilification 2007: Forestry Tasmania v Brown: Environmental law: 2010: Keech v Metropolitan Health Service: Anti-discrimination: 2010: ACCC v Cabcharge Australia Ltd ...
Australian Military Court (2007–2009) [b] Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration (1904–1956) [c] Commonwealth Industrial Court (1956–1973) [d] Family Court (1976–2021) Federal Circuit Court / Federal Magistrates Court (1999–2021) Federal Court of Bankruptcy (1930–1977) [e] Industrial Relations Court of Australia (1994 ...
Australian National Airways Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (No 1) [1] – most commonly known as Australian National Airways Pty Ltd v Commonwealth and also referred to as The Airlines Case or the ANA Case – was a High Court of Australia decision. The case dealt with limits of the powers of the Australian Federal Government under sections 51 and 92 ...
The High Court of Australia sits at the apex of the Australian court hierarchy as the ultimate court of appeal on matters of both federal and State law. The large number of courts in Australia have different procedural powers and characteristics, different jurisdictional limits, different remedial powers and different cost structures.