enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Miller)_v_Secretary_of...

    R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [1] is a United Kingdom constitutional law case decided by the United Kingdom Supreme Court on 24 January 2017, which ruled that the British Government (the executive) might not initiate withdrawal from the European Union by formal notification to the Council of the European Union ...

  3. R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

    The case, R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, went to the Divisional Court, where it was heard by judges Richard Gibbs and John Laws. [13] Bancoult's argument was made on several grounds: firstly, that the Crown could not exclude a British citizen from British territory, except in times of war, without a ...

  4. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

    R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union [1995] UKHL 3 is a House of Lords case concerning the awarding of compensation under the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme. The case is considered significant in constitutional terms for its ruling on the extent of ministerial prerogative powers.

  5. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

    The House of Lords allowed the appeal. Lord Steyn gave the leading judgment. Lord Hoffmann agreed with Lord Steyn and said the following. [note 1]Parliamentary sovereignty means that Parliament can, if it chooses, legislate contrary to fundamental principles of human rights.

  6. R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

    R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody [1993] UKHL 8, [1994] 1 AC 531 was an important UK constitutional law case concerning applications for ...

  7. R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Secretary_of_State_for...

    R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Bancoult (No 1) [2000] EWHC Admin 413 was a 2000 legal case in which Olivier Bancoult sought a judicial review of the ordinance which allowed the Chaggosian people to be forcibly removed from their homeland.

  8. R (on the application of Bancoult (No 2)) v Secretary of ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(on_the_application_of...

    R (on the application of Bancoult (No 2)) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2016] UKSC 35 [1] was a 2016 judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom that affirmed the decision of the House of Lords in R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex parte Bancoult (No 2) despite new evidence subsequently coming to light. [2]

  9. R (Venables and Thompson) v Home Secretary - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_(Venables_and_Thompson...

    R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Venables and Thompson [1997] UKHL 25 is a UK constitutional law case, concerning the exercise of independent judgement in judicial review. Facts