Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 435 U.S. 519 (1978), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a court cannot impose rulemaking procedures on a federal government agency.
In 1978, the Vermont Yankee reactor was the subject of Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., an important United States Supreme Court administrative law case which ruled that courts cannot impose procedures upon the NRC as this exceeds their power of judicial review.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. 435 U.S. 519 (1978) Judicial deference to government agencies Frank Lyon Co. v. United States: 435 U.S. 561 (1978) Ownership of realty in sale-leaseback for tax deduction for depreciation purposes. McDaniel v. Paty: 435 U.S. 618 (1978)
Supreme Court of the United States: 2001 Chemical Waste Management, Inc. v. Hunt: Cleanliness: interstate importation fee for disposal of hazardous waste: Supreme Court of the United States: 1992 Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. Air: emissions from new equipment and total emissions from plant: Supreme Court of the ...
The Vermont Supreme Court meets in a granite Beaux Arts-style building in Montpelier, just east of the Vermont State House and immediately west of The Pavilion Office Building. The building site was the original site of the first Vermont State Building, a three-story wooden colonial Georgian structure, built in 1808 by Sylvanus Baldwin.
The Vermont Supreme Court ruled last week that the Green Mountain Care Board is within its rights to limit executive pay at OneCare Vermont. State Supreme Court rules state regulators can limit ...
The Supreme Court this week announced it is taking up a case that, although it hasn’t grabbed nearly as many headlines as some of its recent high-profile rulings, could have a profound impact on ...
Kisor v. Wilkie, No. 18-15, 588 U.S. ___ (2019), was a US Supreme Court case related to the interpretation by an executive agency of its own ambiguous regulations. The case involved a veteran who had been denied some benefits from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs due to the agency's interpretation of its regulations.