enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Michigan Department of State Police v. Sitz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan_Department_of...

    Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the constitutionality of police sobriety checkpoints. The Court held 6-3 that these checkpoints met the Fourth Amendment standard of "reasonable search and seizure." However, upon remand to the Michigan Supreme Court, that court held ...

  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State Police - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Will_v._Michigan...

    Will v. Michigan Dept. of State Police, 491 U.S. 58 (1989), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, in which the Court held that States and their officials acting in their official capacity are not persons when sued for monetary damages under the Civil Rights Act of 1871.

  4. DWI court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DWI_court

    DWI courts tend to focus on the most serious cases and repeat offenders, and thus apply strict standards to the cases and defendants that come before them. [1] Drunk and impaired driving offenses involves a substantial risk of harm and death to the driver and to others, as a foreseeable consequence of such conduct. [2]

  5. List of U.S. states by Alford plea usage - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by...

    This list of U.S. states by Alford plea usage documents usage of the form of guilty plea known as the Alford plea in each of the U.S. states in the United States. An Alford plea (also referred to as Alford guilty plea [1] [2] [3] and Alford doctrine [4] [5] [6]) in the law of the United States is a guilty plea in criminal court, [7] [8] [9] where the defendant does not admit the act and ...

  6. Bennis v. Michigan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bennis_v._Michigan

    Bennis v. Michigan, 516 U.S. 442 (1996), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that the innocent owner defense is not constitutionally mandated by Fourteenth Amendment Due Process in cases of civil forfeiture.

  7. Driver in suspected DUI crash that killed 2 children may have ...

    www.aol.com/driver-suspected-dui-crash-killed...

    Monroe County Sheriff Troy Goodnough’s voice quivered as he spoke to news media. He appeared to hold back tears as he read a statement that described the scene after the car went through a wall ...

  8. Hudson v. Michigan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudson_v._Michigan

    Hudson v. Michigan, 547 U.S. 586 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a violation of the Fourth Amendment requirement that police officers knock, announce their presence, and wait a reasonable amount of time before entering a private residence (the knock-and-announce requirement) does not require suppression of the evidence obtained in the ensuing search.

  9. Michigan State Police trooper charged with second-degree ...

    www.aol.com/news/michigan-state-police-trooper...

    A Michigan State Police trooper who drove his unmarked SUV into a 25-year-old Kentwood man that was fleeing from police has been charged with second-degree murder. Michigan Attorney General Dana ...