Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Unemployment rate at start of presidency Unemployment rate at end of presidency Change in unemployment rate during presidency (percentage points) Harry S. Truman (data available for 1948–1953 only) Democratic: 1945–1953 3.4% (for January 1948) 2.9% −0.5 (from January 1948 to January 1953) Dwight D. Eisenhower: Republican: 1953–1961 2.9% ...
Ford’s presidency, which lasted just 895 days, saw the second-highest rate of unemployment — second only to George W. Bush, who served during the Great Recession.
Annual rate of change of unemployment rate over presidential terms in office. From President Truman onward, the unemployment rate fell by 0.8% with a Democratic president on average, while it rose 1.1% with a Republican. [27] Job creation is reported monthly and receives significant media attention, as a proxy for the overall health of the economy.
For example, for President Obama, the computation takes the 145.815 million jobs of February 2017 and subtracts the 133.312 million jobs of February 2009 to arrive at the 12.503 million figure. Four of the top five presidents in terms of total jobs added were Democrats.
The rate was the highest of any month since the BLS began tracking in 1948. According to BLS statistics, the unemployment rate was at 3.5% in Feb 2020, a month prior to the pandemic's start in the ...
Nevada had the highest unemployment rate of any of the 50 states in September, at 5.6%. The figure is higher than it was before the COVID-19 pandemic and has been creeping up since May.
Annual Real Gross Domestic Product Growth Rate — 1930 through 2022. Following the end of World War II and the large adjustment as the economy adjusted from wartime to peacetime in 1945, the collection of many economic indicators, such as unemployment and gross domestic product (GDP) became standardized. Expansions after World War II may be ...
On Feb. 4, President Joe Biden took a victory lap when a blockbuster January jobs report defied the White House's own low expectations for that month's employment numbers. Analysts had predicted ...