Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The explanatory indispensability argument [a] is an altered form of the Quine–Putnam indispensability argument in the philosophy of mathematics.It claims that we should believe in mathematical objects such as numbers because they are indispensable to scientific explanations of empirical phenomena.
The Quine–Putnam indispensability argument claims that we should believe in abstract mathematical objects such as numbers and sets because mathematics is indispensable to science. One of the most important ideas in the philosophy of mathematics , it is credited to W. V. Quine and Hilary Putnam (pictured) .
According to Melia, we only need to believe in mathematics if it is indispensable to science in the right kind of way. In particular, it needs to be indispensable to scientific explanations. [69] But according to Melia, mathematics plays a purely representational role in science, it merely "[makes] more things sayable about concrete objects". [70]
The way we work is changing and the pace of change is accelerating faster than you think. Change is rapid, radical and unpredictable.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
The Indispensability of Mathematics [1] is a 2001 book by Mark Colyvan in which he examines the Quine–Putnam indispensability argument in the philosophy of mathematics.This thesis is based on the premise that mathematical entities are placed on the same ontological foundation as other theoretical entities indispensable to our best scientific theories.
Indispensable America is the most costly option. However, failing to protect US values and basic freedoms across the world presents the greater risk. According to Bremmer, a " superpower " is a country that can exert enough military, political, and economic power to persuade nations in every region of the world to take important actions they ...