enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Alexandrian text-type - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexandrian_text-type

    The King James Version and other Reformation-era Bibles are translated from the Textus Receptus, a Greek text created by Erasmus and based on various manuscripts of the Byzantine type. In 1721, Richard Bentley outlined a project to create a revised Greek text based on the Codex Alexandrinus. [2]

  3. Textual criticism of the New Testament - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_criticism_of_the...

    It underlies the Textus Receptus used for most Reformation-era translations of the New Testament. The "Majority Text" methodology effectively produces a Byzantine text-type, because Byzantine manuscripts are the most common and consistent. [1] Bible translations relying on the Textus Receptus: KJV, NKJV, Tyndale, Coverdale, Geneva, Bishops ...

  4. Byzantine text-type - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byzantine_text-type

    The different Byzantine "Majority Text" of Hodges & Farstad as well as Robinson & Pierpont is called "Majority" because it is considered to be the Greek text established on the basis of the reading found in the vast majority of the Greek manuscripts. Although the Textus Receptus may be considered a late Byzantine text, it still differs from the ...

  5. Comparison of codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_codices...

    Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, two of the great uncial codices, representatives of the Alexandrian text-type, are considered excellent manuscript witnesses of the text of the New Testament. Most critical editions of the Greek New Testament give precedence to these two chief uncial manuscripts, and the majority of translations are based ...

  6. Textual variants in the Gospel of Mark - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_variants_in_the...

    Alexandrian text-type: Westcott and Hort 1881, Westcott and Hort / [NA27 and UBS4 variants] 1864–94, Tischendorf 8th Edition, Nestle 1904 [14] ἐγὼ μέν (I indeed) – Byz ς. [13] Byz: Stephanus Textus Receptus 1550, Scrivener's Textus Receptus 1894, RP Byzantine Majority Text 2005, Greek Orthodox Church [14] Mark 1:8

  7. Textual variants in the Acts of the Apostles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_variants_in_the...

    Byz: Stephanus Textus Receptus 1550, Scrivener's Textus Receptus 1894, RP Byzantine Majority Text 2005, Greek Orthodox Church [9] καὶ εἶπεν πρὸς αὐτούς (and [he] said to them) – Western text-type: D it [8] ὁ δὲ ἀποκριθεὶς εἶπεν αὐτοῖς (but he, answering them, said) – (C vid) E [8] Acts 1:10

  8. Categories of New Testament manuscripts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categories_of_New...

    These manuscripts have almost no Byzantine influence, and often agree with the Alexandrian text-type (but are not necessarily Alexandrian themselves, for example 𝔓 45, 𝔓 46, Codex Vaticanus (B), and minuscule 1739). [4] Some 4th-century and earlier papyri and uncials are in this category, as are manuscripts of the Alexandrian text-type ...

  9. Textual variants in the Book of Revelation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textual_variants_in_the...

    John Mill's 1707 Greek New Testament was estimated to contain some 30,000 variants in its accompanying textual apparatus [1] which was based on "nearly 100 [Greek] manuscripts." [ 2 ] Peter J. Gurry puts the number of non-spelling variants among New Testament manuscripts around 500,000, though he acknowledges his estimate is higher than all ...