Ad
related to: biodiversity concepts patterns and measurement problems 4th level of analysis
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
There are many ways to measure biodiversity within a given ecosystem. However, the two most popular are Shannon-Weaver diversity index, [4] commonly referred to as Shannon diversity index, and the other is Simpsons diversity index. [5] Although many scientists prefer to use Shannon's diversity index simply because it takes into account species ...
The observed species richness is affected not only by the number of individuals but also by the heterogeneity of the sample. If individuals are drawn from different environmental conditions (or different habitats), the species richness of the resulting set can be expected to be higher than if all individuals are drawn from similar environments.
Consequently, some macroecological and community patterns cannot be fully expressed by alpha and beta diversity. Due to these two reasons, a new way of measuring species turnover, coined Zeta diversity (ζ-diversity), [ 12 ] has been proposed and used to connect all existing incidence-based biodiversity patterns.
Rarefaction analysis assumes that the individuals in an environment are randomly distributed, the sample size is sufficiently large, that the samples are taxonomically similar, and that all of the samples have been performed in the same manner. If these assumptions are not met, the resulting curves will be greatly skewed. [8]
Species richness, or biodiversity, increases from the poles to the tropics for a wide variety of terrestrial and marine organisms, often referred to as the latitudinal diversity gradient. [1] The latitudinal diversity gradient is one of the most widely recognized patterns in ecology. [1] It has been observed to varying degrees in Earth's past. [2]
Relative species abundance and species richness describe key elements of biodiversity. [1] Relative species abundance refers to how common or rare a species is relative to other species in a given location or community. [1] [4] Usually relative species abundances are described for a single trophic level.
SAD is a measurement of how common, or rare species are within an ecosystem. [5] This allows researchers to assess how different species are distributed throughout an ecosystem. SAD is one of the most basic measurements in ecology and is used very often, therefore many different methods of measurement and analysis have developed.
abundance class 1 1-2 2-4 4-8 8-16 species 5 0 1.5 1.5 1 The three species of abundance four thus appear, 1.5 in abundance class 2–4, and 1.5 in 4–8. The above method of analysis cannot account for species that are unsampled: that is, species sufficiently rare to have been recorded zero times.
Ad
related to: biodiversity concepts patterns and measurement problems 4th level of analysis