enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Comparison of video converters - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video_converters

   Supported input container formats ; Video converter 3GP AVI Blu-ray video DVD video FLV Matroska MP4 MPEG-PS Ogg QuickTime SVCD TS TOD VCD WMV; Any Video Converter: Yes: Yes: Yes: Yes: Yes

3. Freemake Audio Converter - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freemake_Audio_Converter

   The program is capable of extracting the audio soundtrack from different video formats, such as DVD, MP4, AVI, MPEG, H.264, MKV, DIVX, MOV, WMV, VOB, 3GP, RM, QT, and FLV. [ 5 ] The user interface of Freemake Audio Converter is based on Windows Presentation Foundation technology.

4. Audio converter - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_converter

   M4A (MPEG-4 Audio): A compressed format often used with Apple devices, similar to MP3 but potentially offering higher quality at the same bitrate. FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec): A lossless compression format that maintains the original audio quality but creates files larger than MP3s. OGG Vorbis: An open-source, lossless compression format ...

5. Any Video Converter - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Any_Video_Converter

   Any Video Converter is a video converter developed by Anvsoft Inc. for Microsoft Windows and macOS. [3] It is available in both a free and paid version. Any Video Converter Windows version won the CNET Downloads 5 star award in 2012.

6. MediaHuman Audio Converter - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MediaHuman_Audio_Converter

   MediaHuman Audio Converter is able to accept many popular audio file formats, such as MP3, WMA and WAV. The software is also capable of importing files to iTunes (Music app on macOS Catalina and above [4]). [5] MediaHuman Audio Converter is designed to use multiple CPU cores when converting files in ‘batch mode’. [6]

7. Comparison of video container formats - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_video...

   Overhead is affected by the total number of packets and by the size of stream packet headers. In high bitrate encodings, the content payload is usually large enough to make the overhead data relatively insignificant, but in low bitrate encodings, the inefficiency of the overhead can significantly affect the resulting file size if the container ...