Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
For example, many programming languages provide special syntax for referencing and updating array elements. Abstractly, an array reference is a procedure of two arguments: an array and a subscript vector, which could be expressed as get_array(Array, vector(i,j)). Instead, many languages provide syntax such as Array[i,j].
List comprehension is a syntactic construct available in some programming languages for creating a list based on existing lists. It follows the form of the mathematical set-builder notation (set comprehension) as distinct from the use of map and filter functions.
# is the constructor symbol: It calls the create method of the class whose name follows the operator. In this example, it's used for instantiating the OUT class, which is the class for the standard output. The + operator has been overloaded by the class to append the string passed as argument to the stream. Operators such as + are syntactic ...
Operator overloading is syntactic sugar, and is used because it allows programming using notation nearer to the target domain [1] and allows user-defined types a similar level of syntactic support as types built into a language. It is common, for example, in scientific computing, where it allows computing representations of mathematical objects ...
Cascading is syntactic sugar that eliminates the need to list the object repeatedly. This is particularly used in fluent interfaces , which feature many method calls on a single object. This is particularly useful if the object is the value of a lengthy expression, as it eliminates the need to either list the expression repeatedly or use a ...
Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects ... (programming language) Object-oriented programming as syntactic sugar for accessing properties.
In the programming language Dylan, which is an object-oriented language that supports multimethods and doesn't have a concept of this, sending a message to an object is still kept in the syntax. The two forms below work in the same way; the differences are just syntactic sugar. object.method(param1, param2) and method (object, param1, param2)
p. q is syntactic sugar for p ["q"]. function p. q is syntactic sugar for p ["q"] = function. function builds a function. It doesn't declare it. Functions are first-class objects and can be assigned to variables, placed in tables, serialized into strings, and deserialized back out again. Think interpreted, not compiled.