enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. DO-178C - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DO-178C

    The flexible nature of DO-178C's processes and entry/exit criteria make it difficult to implement the first time, because these aspects are abstract and there is no "base set" of activities from which to work. The intention of DO-178C was not to be prescriptive. There are many possible and acceptable ways for a real project to define these aspects.

  3. Modified condition/decision coverage - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_condition/...

    MC/DC is used in avionics software development guidance DO-178B and DO-178C to ensure adequate testing of the most critical (Level A) software, which is defined as that software which could provide (or prevent failure of) continued safe flight and landing of an aircraft.

  4. DO-178B - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DO-178B

    Although technically a guideline, it was a de facto standard for developing avionics software systems until it was replaced in 2012 by DO-178C. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) applies DO-178B as the document it uses for guidance to determine if the software will perform reliably in an airborne environment, [ 1 ] when specified by the ...

  5. Category:RTCA standards - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:RTCA_standards

    Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects ... Pages in category "RTCA standards" ... DO-178C; DO-212; DO-219; DO-232; DO-242A; DO-248C;

  6. Automotive Safety Integrity Level - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automotive_Safety...

    DO-178C and DO-254 define the design assurance objectives that must be accomplished for given DAL. Unlike SIL, it is the case that both ASIL and DAL are statements measuring degree of hazard. DAL E is the ARP4754 equivalent of QM; in both classifications hazards are negligible and safety management is not required.

  7. DO-254 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DO-254

    The DO-254/ED-80 standard is the counterpart to the well-established software standard RTCA DO-178C/EUROCAE ED-12C. With DO-254/ED-80, the certification authorities have indicated that avionics equipment contains both hardware and software, and each is critical to safe operation of aircraft.

  8. DO-248 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DO-248

    Like DO-178C and DO-278A, it is a joint RTCA undertaking with EUROCAE and the document is also published as ED-94C, Supporting Information for ED-12C and ED-109A. [2] The publication does not provide any guidance additional to DO-178C or DO-278A; rather, it only provides clarification for the guidance established in those standards. [3]

  9. Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_Technical_Commission...

    Many of RTCA documents begin with the letters DO which stands for DOcument. RTCA develops Minimum Operating Performance Standards for aviation-based technology (typically avionics) but has developed standards for such far-ranging topics as Airport Security, Counter UAS Detection standards, and Aircraft Cockpit and Cabin Cleaning standards.