enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. DO-178C - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DO-178C

    The flexible nature of DO-178C's processes and entry/exit criteria make it difficult to implement the first time, because these aspects are abstract and there is no "base set" of activities from which to work. The intention of DO-178C was not to be prescriptive. There are many possible and acceptable ways for a real project to define these aspects.

  3. Software safety - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_safety

    Various standards suggest different levels, e.g. Software Levels A-E in DO-178C, [4] SIL (Safety Integrity Level) 1-4 in IEC 61508, [1] ASIL (Automotive Safety Integrity Level) A-D in ISO 26262. [2] The assignment is typically done in the context of an overarching system, where the worst case consequences of software failures are investigated.

  4. Modified condition/decision coverage - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_condition/...

    For example, assignment of the number of days in a month (excluding leap years) could be achieved by using either a switch statement or by using a table with an enumeration value as an index. The number of tests required based on the source code could be considerably different depending upon the coverage required, although semantically we would ...

  5. AC 20-115 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AC_20-115

    The earliest revisions of the Advisory Circular were brief, serving little more than to call attention to active DO-178 revisions. The Advisory Circular revisions C and D are considerably longer, giving guidance in modifying and re-using software previously approved using DO-178, DO-178A, or DO-178B (preceding revisions of the DO-178 standard).

  6. Automotive Safety Integrity Level - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automotive_Safety...

    DO-178C and DO-254 define the design assurance objectives that must be accomplished for given DAL. Unlike SIL, it is the case that both ASIL and DAL are statements measuring degree of hazard. DAL E is the ARP4754 equivalent of QM; in both classifications hazards are negligible and safety management is not required.

  7. DO-248 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DO-248

    Like DO-178C and DO-278A, it is a joint RTCA undertaking with EUROCAE and the document is also published as ED-94C, Supporting Information for ED-12C and ED-109A. [2] The publication does not provide any guidance additional to DO-178C or DO-278A; rather, it only provides clarification for the guidance established in those standards. [ 3 ]

  8. After Getting to Eat an Edible Mascot Last Year, 2024 Pop ...

    www.aol.com/getting-eat-edible-mascot-last...

    Dreams really do come true at the Pop-Tarts Bowl. The Pop-Tarts Bowl and GE Appliances announced on Monday, Dec. 16 that the trophy for the 2024 bowl game will feature a full-operational toaster.

  9. Software quality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_quality

    For example, an attribute associated with portability is the number of target-dependent statements in a program. More precisely, using the Quality Function Deployment approach, these measurable attributes are the "hows" that need to be enforced to enable the "whats" in the Software Quality definition above.