Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The law of effect, or Thorndike's law, is a psychology principle advanced by Edward Thorndike in 1898 on the matter of behavioral conditioning (not then formulated as such) which states that "responses that produce a satisfying effect in a particular situation become more likely to occur again in that situation, and responses that produce a ...
Operant conditioning originated with Edward Thorndike, whose law of effect theorised that behaviors arise as a result of consequences as satisfying or discomforting. In the 20th century, operant conditioning was studied by behavioral psychologists, who believed that much of mind and behaviour is explained through environmental conditioning.
Thorndike's theory was an association theory, as many were in that time. He believed that the association between stimulus and response was solidified by a reward or confirmation. He also thought that motivation was an important factor in learning. [20] The Law of Effect introduced the relation between reinforcers and punishers.
Edward Thorndike developed the first three "Laws of learning": readiness, exercise, and effect. Readiness. Since learning is an active process, students must have ...
B. F. Skinner expanded upon Thorndike's existing work. [9] Skinner theorized that if a behavior is followed by a reward, that behavior is more likely to be repeated, but added that if it is followed by some sort of punishment, it is less likely to be repeated. He introduced the word reinforcement into Thorndike's law of effect. [10]
Edward Thorndike. Edward Thorndike (1874–1949) presented his theory of the "Law of Effect" in 1898. [16] According to this theory, humans and other animals learn ...
Here are some Mandela effect examples that have confused me over the years — and many others too. Grab your friends and see which false memories you may share. 1.
Edward Thorndike did research in this area and developed the law of effect, where associations between a stimulus and response are affected by the consequence of the response. [7] For example, behaviors increase in strength and/or frequency when they have been followed by reward.