Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The table below lists the judgments of the Constitutional Court of South Africa delivered in 2023. [1]The members of the court at the start of 2023 were Chief Justice Raymond Zondo, Deputy Chief Justice Mandisa Maya, and judges Jody Kollapen, Mbuyiseli Madlanga, Steven Majiedt, Rammaka Mathopo, Nonkosi Mhlantla, Owen Rogers, Leona Theron and Zukisa Tshiqi.
Robinson v Randfontein Estates Gold Mining Co Ltd 1921 AD 168. Director's conflict of interest. Salomon v. A. Salomon & Co. Ltd. [1897] AC 22. Sasol Oil v Nationwide Poles 2006 (3) SA 400 (CAC). South African Airways (Pty) Ltd v Comair Ltd and Another 2012 (1) SA 20 (CAC). Stellenbosch Farmers' Winery Ltd v Distillers Corporation (SA) Ltd and ...
The table below lists the judgments of the Constitutional Court of South Africa delivered in 2019.. The members of the court at the start of 2019 were Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng, Deputy Chief Justice Raymond Zondo, and judges Edwin Cameron, Johan Froneman, Chris Jafta, Sisi Khampepe, Mbuyiseli Madlanga, Nonkosi Mhlantla and Leona Theron.
Arena Holdings (Pty) Ltd t/a Financial Mail and Others v South African Revenue Service and Others is a 2023 decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa on tax confidentiality. The court held that tax confidentiality provisions of the Promotion of Access to Information Act, 2000 and Tax Administration Act, 2011 imposed unconstitutional ...
AllPay Consolidated Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others v Chief Executive Officer of the South African Social Security Agency and Others is the name of three related decisions of the Constitutional Court of South Africa, handed down in 2013, 2014, and 2015 respectively.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd: 1992 110 CLR 445; [1992] HCA 66 Mason: 1357 76. Jago v District Court (NSW) 1989 168 CLR 23; [1989] HCA 46 Mason: 1354 77. Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission: 1992 175 CLR 564; [1992] HCA 10 Mason: 1346 78. Stevens v Brodribb Sawmilling Co Pty Ltd: 1986 160 CLR 16; [1986] HCA 1 Gibbs: 1343 79.
The case is U.S. v. Huawei Technologies Co et al, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York, No. 18-cr-00457. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; editing by Jonathan Oatis)