Ad
related to: cite or site your sources for research proposal- Grammarly Pro
For writing at work or school.
Unlock advanced features.
- Sign-Up
Create a free account today.
Great writing, simplified.
- Free Citation Generator
Get citations within seconds.
Never lose points over formatting.
- Free Punctuation Checker
Fix punctuation and spelling.
Find errors instantly.
- Grammarly Pro
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Providing sources for your edits, in particular for edits that are challenged by other editors, is mandated by Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Verifiability, which are policy. Citing reliable sources serves several purposes: To ensure that articles are accurate and credible. To show that your edit isn't original research.
Inline citations, which link specific reliable sources with specific pieces of information in the article, provide practical support for these policies by making it easier to check the article content. This page applies the advice in the policies, and in the citing sources guideline, to referencing science and mathematics articles. The goal is ...
In heated debates, users often cite essays, proposals, WikiProject advice pages, information pages and template documentation pages as defence of their own actions, or to make an accusation of wrongdoing against another editor. This is often inappropriate and can lead to the escalation of a conflict.
If your knowledge of the source is secondhand—that is, if you have read Jones (2010), who cited Smith (2009), and you want to use what Smith (2009) said—make clear that your knowledge of Smith is based on your reading of Jones. When citing the source, write the following (this formatting is just an example): John Smith (2009).
The source of the material should always be clear, and editors should exercise caution when rearranging cited material to ensure that the text–source relationship isn't broken. If you write a multi-sentence paragraph that draws on material from one source, the source need not be cited after every single sentence unless the material is ...
Sources that are reliable for some material are not reliable for other material. For instance, otherwise unreliable self-published sources are usually acceptable to support uncontroversial information about the source's author. You should always try to use the best possible source, particularly when writing about living people.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Citations are important in Wikipedia to ensure that information comes from actual, reliable sources (WP:V, WP:CITE). There are three preferred ways of citing sources: Footnotes; Footnotes with list-defined references; Shortened footnotes
Ad
related to: cite or site your sources for research proposal