Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
It’s easy to argue that Trump should be held accountable if a prosecutor believes there’s evidence to support a conviction. He’s not above the law just because he is running for president ...
Prosecutors in Michigan have taken the nearly unprecedented step of charging the parents of an alleged school shooter ... Gun owners should know they’ll be held accountable for how their weapons ...
If laws were broken, prosecutors should be exposed and held accountable for weaponizing the justice system. Democrats have spent the last four years lecturing us that no one is above the law.
In United States law, absolute immunity is a type of sovereign immunity for government officials that confers complete immunity from criminal prosecution and suits for damages, so long as officials are acting within the scope of their duties. [1]
Judicial immunity is a form of sovereign immunity, which protects judges and others employed by the judiciary from liability resulting from their judicial actions. [1] It is intended to ensure that judges can make decisions free from improper influence exercised on them, contributing to the impartiality of the judiciary and the rule of law. [2]
The top federal prosecutor in Washington, ... “He should be held accountable for the absolute misery and lives that have been destroyed from these January 6 defendants and their families. We ...
Prosecutors over the past few years have been slowly, but steadily, expanding the notion of who can be held accountable for a mass shooting, said CNN Senior Legal Analyst Elie Honig, a former ...
Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51 (2011), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court considered whether a prosecutor's office can be held liable for a single Brady violation by one of its members on the theory that the office provided inadequate training. [1]