Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In the theory of optimal binary search trees, the interleave lower bound is a lower bound on the number of operations required by a Binary Search Tree (BST) to execute a given sequence of accesses. Several variants of this lower bound have been proven. [1] [2] [3] This article is based on a variation of the first Wilber's bound. [4]
Binary search Visualization of the binary search algorithm where 7 is the target value Class Search algorithm Data structure Array Worst-case performance O (log n) Best-case performance O (1) Average performance O (log n) Worst-case space complexity O (1) Optimal Yes In computer science, binary search, also known as half-interval search, logarithmic search, or binary chop, is a search ...
A schematic picture of the skip list data structure. Each box with an arrow represents a pointer and a row is a linked list giving a sparse subsequence; the numbered boxes (in yellow) at the bottom represent the ordered data sequence.
Lower bounds again are defined by inverting the order. For example, -5 is a lower bound of the natural numbers as a subset of the integers. Given a set of sets, an upper bound for these sets under the subset ordering is given by their union. In fact, this upper bound is quite special: it is the smallest set that contains all of the sets.
An x-fast trie containing the integers 1 (001 2), 4 (100 2) and 5 (101 2), which can be used to efficiently solve the predecessor problem.. One simple solution to this problem is to use a balanced binary search tree, which achieves (in Big O notation) a running time of () for predecessor queries.
The longest increasing subsequence problem is closely related to the longest common subsequence problem, which has a quadratic time dynamic programming solution: the longest increasing subsequence of a sequence is the longest common subsequence of and , where is the result of sorting.
The cost of a search is modeled by assuming that the search tree algorithm has a single pointer into a binary search tree, which at the start of each search points to the root of the tree. The algorithm may then perform any sequence of the following operations: Move the pointer to its left child. Move the pointer to its right child.
This is an information-theoretic lower bound on the number of correct symbols required to perform decoding and with list decoding, we can potentially achieve this information-theoretic limit. However, to realize this potential, we need explicit codes (codes that can be constructed in polynomial time) and efficient algorithms to perform encoding ...