Ads
related to: state of california warrant searchcourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
- Search Past Warrants
Check For Any Outstanding Warrants
Find Public County Warrant Records
- Search Warrants By Name
People May Have A Criminal Past
Check For Active Warrants Today
- Check Active Warrants
Quickly Find County Warrants
For You Or Someone Else. Search Now
- Check Arrest Warrants
1) Enter Any Name To Search
2) Find Arrest & Warrant Records
- Search Past Warrants
reviewpublicrecords.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), [1] is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court ruled that the warrantless search and seizure of the digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment.
Warrantless search incident to arrest must be contemporaneous with and in general vicinity of arrest to be reasonable; consent from hotel personnel, even in management, is insufficient to permit search of guest room without warrant. California Court of Appeal, Second District, reversed and remanded. Court membership; Chief Justice Earl Warren
People v. Diaz, 51 Cal. 4th 84, 244 P.3d 501, 119 Cal. Rptr. 3d 105 (Cal. January 3, 2011) was a Supreme Court of California case, which held that police are not required to obtain a warrant to search information contained within a cell phone in a lawful arrest. [1]
Police can also search your phone with your consent. In Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, California ruled that law enforcement can search your phone without a warrant if you voluntarily agree to the search.
Officers informed Cardenas that they had a search warrant and would be conducting a strip search, according to the lawsuit Allred brought against the California Correctional Institute, Adventist ...
Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969), was a 1969 United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that police officers arresting a person at his home could not search the entire home without a search warrant, but that police may search the area within immediate reach of the person without a warrant. [1]
When they exercised the search warrant at Espinosa’s home, they found the missing diamonds, as well as other items from about 12 victims. ... In California, the State Controller’s Office is ...
Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966), was a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court case in which the Court clarified the application of the Fourth Amendment's protection against warrantless searches and the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination for searches that intrude into the human body.
Ads
related to: state of california warrant searchcourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
reviewpublicrecords.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month