enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 322

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    United States v. White (1944) 322 U.S. 694: 1944: External links. Supreme Court of the United States (www.supremecourt.gov) United States Supreme Court cases in ...

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Stone Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Hirabayashi v. United States: 320 U.S. 81 (1943) curfews against members of a minority group during a war with their country of origin Yasui v. United States: 320 U.S. 115 (1943) validity of curfews against U.S. citizens of a minority group during war Prince v. Massachusetts: 321 U.S. 158 (1944) religious liberty and child labor: Follett v ...

  4. United States v. White - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._White

    United States v. White, 401 U.S. 745 (1971), was a United States Supreme Court decision which held that recording conversations using concealed radio transmitters worn by informants does not violate the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, and thus does not require a warrant.

  5. Category : United States Supreme Court cases of the White Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:United_States...

    United States v. Alaska Steamship Co. United States v. American Tobacco Co. United States v. Colgate & Co. United States v. Doremus; United States v. Forty Barrels and Twenty Kegs of Coca-Cola; United States v. Grimaud; United States v. Johnson (1911) United States v. Nice; United States v. Oppenheimer; United States v. Quiver; United States v ...

  6. United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._South...

    South-Eastern Underwriters Association, 322 U.S. 533 (1944), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Sherman Act, the federal antitrust statute, applied to insurance. To reach this decision, the Court held that insurance could be regulated by the United States Congress under the Commerce Clause, overturning Paul v

  7. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazel-Atlas_Glass_Co._v...

    Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238 (1944), is a much cited 1944 decision of the United States Supreme Court dealing with fraud on the Patent Office. [1] A widely quoted statement in the Court's opinion is: "The public welfare demands that the agencies of public justice be not so impotent that they must always be mute and ...

  8. Lyons v. Oklahoma - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyons_v._Oklahoma

    Lyons v. Oklahoma , 322 U.S. 596 (1944), was a United States Supreme Court case about the beatings and subsequent coerced confessions of William Douglas Lyons, a man convicted of a triple murder in Oklahoma. [ 1 ]

  9. Screws v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Screws_v._United_States

    140 F.2d 662 (5th Cir. 1944). Procedural: Cert. granted, 322 U.S. 718 (1944). Holding; In general, a conviction under 18 U.S.C. §242 requires proof of the defendant's specific intent to deprive the victim of a federal right. In Screws, the prosecution has failed to prove such deliberate intent. Court membership; Chief Justice Harlan F. Stone ...