enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. CAP theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAP_theorem

    Note that consistency as defined in the CAP theorem is quite different from the consistency guaranteed in ACID database transactions. [4] Availability Every request received by a non-failing node in the system must result in a response. This is the definition of availability in CAP theorem as defined by Gilbert and Lynch. [1]

  3. Consistency (database systems) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consistency_(database_systems)

    The CAP theorem is based on three trade-offs, one of which is "atomic consistency" (shortened to "consistency" for the acronym), about which the authors note, "Discussing atomic consistency is somewhat different than talking about an ACID database, as database consistency refers to transactions, while atomic consistency refers only to a property of a single request/response operation sequence.

  4. Voldemort (distributed data store) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voldemort_(distributed...

    A 2012 study comparing systems for storing application performance management data reported that Voldemort, Apache Cassandra, and HBase all offered linear scalability in most cases, with Voldemort having the lowest latency and Cassandra having the highest throughput. [3] In the parlance of Eric Brewer's CAP theorem, Voldemort is an AP type system.

  5. PACELC theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PACELC_theorem

    The tradeoff between availability, consistency and latency, as described by the PACELC theorem. In database theory, the PACELC theorem is an extension to the CAP theorem.It states that in case of network partitioning (P) in a distributed computer system, one has to choose between availability (A) and consistency (C) (as per the CAP theorem), but else (E), even when the system is running ...

  6. Distributed SQL - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distributed_SQL

    Following the CAP Theorem, distributed SQL databases are "CP" or consistent and partition-tolerant. Algorithmically they sacrifice availability in that a failure of a primary node can make the database unavailable for writes. All distributed SQL implementations require some kind of temporal synchronization to guarantee consistency.

  7. Couchbase Server - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Couchbase_Server

    Starting with the 4.0 release, the three services can be distributed to run on separate nodes of the cluster if needed. In the parlance of Eric Brewer's CAP theorem, Couchbase is normally a CP type system meaning it provides consistency and partition tolerance, or it can be set up as an AP system with multiple clusters.

  8. Daniel Abadi - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Abadi

    He helped create C-Store, a column-oriented database, and HadoopDB, a hybrid of relational databases and Hadoop. Both database systems were commercialized by companies. Abadi was the first to describe the PACELC theorem in a 2010 blog post. PACELC, a response to the CAP theorem, was proved formally in 2018 in a SIGACT News article. [4]

  9. Eventual consistency - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eventual_consistency

    Eventual consistency is a consistency model used in distributed computing to achieve high availability.Put simply: if no new updates are made to a given data item, eventually all accesses to that item will return the last updated value. [1]