enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Bowman v. Monsanto Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowman_v._Monsanto_Co.

    Bowman v. Monsanto Co., 569 U.S. 278 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court patent decision in which the Court unanimously affirmed the decision of the Federal Circuit that the patent exhaustion doctrine does not permit a farmer to plant and grow saved, patented seeds without the patent owner's permission. [1]

  3. Bowman v. Monsanto: The Price We All Pay for Roundup Ready Seeds

    www.aol.com/news/on-monsanto-gmo-roundup-ready...

    Since, as the AP reports, "[m]ore than 90 percent of American soybean farms use Monsanto's seeds," it was highly likely that what Bowman bought would be glyphosate-resistant stock. That turned out ...

  4. Monsanto legal cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsanto_legal_cases

    Such activity was found by the United States Supreme Court to constitute patent infringement in Bowman v. Monsanto Co. (2013). [11] The case began in 2007, when Monsanto sued Indiana farmer Vernon Hugh Bowman who in 1999 bought seed for his second planting from a grain elevator – the same elevator to which he and others sold their transgenic ...

  5. List of United States patent law cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Bowman v. Monsanto - Supreme Court, 2012. Patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission. Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics - Supreme Court, 2013. Invalidated patents on naturally occurring DNA segments, but not on cDNA.

  6. Bought This Ice Cream? Here's How to Claim Your Share of an ...

    www.aol.com/bought-ice-cream-heres-claim...

    Recently, an $8.85 million settlement was reached in a class action lawsuit filed against Unilever United States, Inc., the owner of Breyers, and Conopco, Inc., the New York-based advertiser ...

  7. Industries polluted Columbia’s water with dangerous ‘forever ...

    www.aol.com/industries-polluted-columbia-water...

    The lawsuit did not specify a dollar figure but Columbia city officials have estimated the cost to upgrade the municipal waterworks with a PFAS-filtering system could top $150 million. Running the ...

  8. Monsanto Canada Inc v Schmeiser - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsanto_Canada_Inc_v...

    Monsanto Canada Inc v Schmeiser [2004] 1 S.C.R. 902, 2004 SCC 34 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada case on patent rights for biotechnology, between a Canadian canola farmer, Percy Schmeiser, and the agricultural biotechnology company Monsanto.

  9. Black farmers can get up to $500,000 if they prove they have ...

    www.aol.com/finance/black-farmers-500-000-prove...

    Bowman said local farmers in the area who are in need of technical assistance in-person can visit GTEC in room 217 from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. seven days a week. ... “Once the validity of claims for ...