Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In addition, the bylaws may provide for a specific rule to be suspended. [3] Depending on the type of rule being suspended, a motion to suspend the rules could be adopted with a two-thirds vote. [4] In many cases, suspension of the rules may take place with unanimous consent. [5]
Rules of order consist of rules written by the body itself (often referred to as bylaws), usually supplemented by a published parliamentary authority adopted by the body. Typically, national, state or provincial and other full-scale legislative assemblies have extensive internally written rules of order, whereas non-legislative bodies write and ...
A motion to recommit may take two forms: with instructions to take some action and then report back the bill forthwith, which will result in the Committee chairman immediately re-reporting to the House the bill according to the instructions in the motion to recommit; without instructions, which leaves the bill in committee for reconsideration.
A pending set of bylaws and policies that govern physicians who use Mission Hospital facilities, known as medical staff, has multiple provisions that physicians are concerned would concentrate ...
The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this article, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new article, as appropriate.
Many people come into contact with strata by-laws on a regular basis, since they affect what people living in strata title housing can do in their homes. [7] The most well-known of these is the "no pets in flats" rule. [8] [9]
For a bill to become an act, the text must pass through both houses with a majority, then be either signed into law by the president of the United States, be left unsigned for ten days (excluding Sundays) while Congress remains in session, or, if vetoed by the president, receive a congressional override from 2 ⁄ 3 of both houses.
In 1922, the Supreme Court held in Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon that governmental regulations that went "too far" were a taking. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, writing for the majority of the court, stated that "[t]he general rule at least is that while property may be regulated to a certain extent, if regulation goes too far it will be recognized as a taking."