enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: is a blog credible site that shows the sources of information you have heard

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Blogs as sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blogs_as_sources

    Note that otherwise reliable news sources--for example, the website of a major news organization--that happens to publish in a "blog" style format for some or all of its content may be considered to be equally reliable as if it were published in a more "traditional" 20th-century format of a classic news story.

  3. Wikipedia : Identifying and using self-published works

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_and...

    Self-published sources can be primary, secondary, or tertiary sources. A personal blog is always a self-published source. Here are examples of how different postings on the same blog could be classified: When the blog posting provides information about what the author cooked last night, it is a primary source for its subject matter.

  4. Wikipedia:Assessing reliability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Assessing...

    Particularly if there are few sources listed, it is a good idea to scan those sources to see if they are reliable. Unreliable sources include most blogs and personal websites, although some of these are reliable. Reliable sources include most newspaper and magazine articles, online encyclopedias, and other professional publications such as books.

  5. Wikipedia:Reliable source examples - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_source...

    One exception is that some authorities on certain topics have written extensively on Usenet, and their writings there are vouched for by them or by other reliable sources. A canonical example is J. Michael Straczynski , the creator of the television series Babylon 5 , who discussed the show at length on Usenet.

  6. Wikipedia:Credibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Credibility

    A quote from a book, even by a supposed highly respected source, can be meaningless. A great many legitimate writers refer to things as they see or believe them to be. If called upon, they can properly say it was a minor reference, based on the best available information at the time, and said without malice.

  7. Wikipedia:Verifiability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability

    [g] Exercise caution when using such sources: if the information in question is suitable for inclusion, someone else will probably have published it in independent, reliable sources. [1] Never use self-published sources as third-party sources about living people, even if the author is an expert, well-known professional researcher, or writer.

  8. Wikipedia:Wikipedia as a Citable Source - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_as_a...

    Research papers, particularly the one research paper students write in their eleventh grade, have always been an integral part of high school education [4].They stress the need to verify information and teach students how to evaluate sources critically, and as a result, teachers have developed various criteria to help students identify credible sources, an especially important skill in the ...

  9. Wikipedia:Reliable sources checklist - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources...

    People Magazine does have fact checkers, although possibly intern or junior new hire level I think, but then you have this anecdote which tells of a case of an article mentioning Abe Vigoda. A "top editor" added "the late" in front of Vigoda's name (Vigoda was alive).

  1. Ad

    related to: is a blog credible site that shows the sources of information you have heard