Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In philosophy, empiricism is an epistemological view which holds that true knowledge or justification comes only or primarily from sensory experience and empirical evidence. [1] It is one of several competing views within epistemology, along with rationalism and skepticism .
4. We have good reason to accept naturalism only if it can be rationally inferred from good evidence. 5. Therefore, there is not, and cannot be, good reason to accept naturalism. [1] In short, naturalism undercuts itself. If naturalism is true, then we cannot sensibly believe it or virtually anything else.
De rerum natura (Latin: [deː ˈreːrʊn naːˈtuːraː]; On the Nature of Things) is a first-century BC didactic poem by the Roman poet and philosopher Lucretius (c. 99 BC – c. 55 BC) with the goal of explaining Epicurean philosophy to a Roman audience.
Greek philosophers defined natural philosophy as the combination of beings living in the universe, ignoring things made by humans. [2] The other definition refers to human nature. [2] In the 14th and 15th centuries, natural philosophy was one of many branches of philosophy, but was not a specialized field of study.
Radical empiricism is a postulate, a statement of fact, and a conclusion, says James in The Meaning of Truth.The postulate is that "the only things that shall be debatable among philosophers shall be things definable in terms drawn from experience."
Some European philosophers saw the book's impact on psychology as comparable to Isaac Newton's impact upon science. Voltaire wrote: [ 12 ] Just as a skilled anatomist explains the workings of the human body, so does Locke's Essay on the Human Understanding give the natural history of consciousness.…
Founded by the philosopher Zeno of Citium, the Stoic philosophy was founded around 300 BC in Athens, Greece. The four tenets of this philosophy are wisdom, courage, temperance and justice.
Those philosophers who disagree with this reasoning therefore also see knowledge differently from Aristotle. Aristotle then, described nature or natures as follows, in a way quite different from modern science: [8] "Nature" means: (a) in one sense, the genesis of growing things — as would be suggested by pronouncing the υ of φύσις [9 ...