Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Double negation elimination occurs in classical logics but not in intuitionistic logic. In the context of a formula in the conjunctive normal form, a literal is pure if the literal's complement does not appear in the formula. In Boolean functions, each separate occurrence of a variable, either in inverse or uncomplemented form, is a literal.
Transformation into negation normal form can increase the size of a formula only linearly: the number of occurrences of atomic formulas remains the same, the total number of occurrences of and is unchanged, and the number of occurrences of in the normal form is bounded by the length of the original formula. A formula in negation normal form can ...
Together with double negation elimination one may infer our originally formulated rule, namely that anything follows from an absurdity. Typically the intuitionistic negation of is defined as . Then negation introduction and elimination are just special cases of implication introduction (conditional proof) and elimination (modus ponens).
Propositions for which double-negation elimination is possible are also called stable. Intuitionistic logic proves stability only for restricted types of propositions. A formula for which excluded middle holds can be proven stable using the disjunctive syllogism, which is discussed more thoroughly below. The converse does however not hold in ...
Indirect Proof (IP), [17] negation introduction (−I), [17] negation elimination (−E) [17] m, n RAA (k) [17] The union of the assumption sets at lines m and n, excluding k (the denied assumption). [17] From a sentence and its denial [b] at lines m and n, infer the denial of any assumption appearing in the proof (at line k). [17] Double arrow ...
An atom is a head atom of a set of propositional formulas if at least one occurrence of in a formula from is neither in the scope of a negation nor in the antecedent of an implication. (We assume here that equivalence is treated as an abbreviation, not a primitive connective.)
move to sidebar hide. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rules of inference are syntactical transform rules which one can use to infer a conclusion from a premise to create an argument. A set of rules can be used to infer any valid conclusion if it is complete, while never inferring an invalid conclusion, if it is sound.