Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
SCS Credit Corp., 541 U.S. 465 (2004), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court regarding a cramdown in the value of a loan during a Chapter 13 bankruptcy. The "decision that had no majority opinion, four justices held that the proper rate was the 9.5 percent one arrived at by modifying the average national loan rate to make up for the ...
This is a list of Supreme Court of the United States cases in the area of bankruptcy. This list is a list solely of United States Supreme Court decisions about applying law related to bankruptcy. Not all Supreme Court decisions are ultimately influential and, as in other fields, not all important decisions are made at the Supreme Court level.
federal bankruptcy court binding state court on inheritance question Holmes v. South Carolina: 547 U.S. 319 (2006) limitations on exclusion of evidence in murder case, 6th Amendment: DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno: 547 U.S. 332 (2006) taxpayer standing in a Dormant Commerce Clause case Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc. 547 U.S. 356 ...
Total production in the first six months of that year was less than half of the oil refined in 2018. [15] Describing the situation, an anonymous source stated "In April (2019), the company almost completely ran out of working capital, there was nothing to buy oil with. The plan was as follows: the management of the refinery had to use the loan ...
It is unclear if the retail stores plan to close by Feb. 16., but a separate declaration supporting the bankruptcy said Liberated Brands had about $3.3 million of cash on hand on Monday, which ...
Northern Pipeline Construction Company v. Marathon Pipe Line Company, 458 U.S. 50 (1982), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Article III jurisdiction could not be conferred on non-Article III courts (i.e. courts without the independence and protection given to Article III judges).
Baker Botts L.L.P. v. ASARCO LLC, 576 U.S. 121 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Section 330(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code does not permit bankruptcy courts to award attorney's fees for work performed while defending fee applications.
Delphi sued its investors for US$2.55 billion in securities to aid Delphi as it sought to come out of bankruptcy in May 2008. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert Drain in New York allowed Delphi to seek payments through a contract against Appaloosa Management LP as well as denying an investors' request for a cap of $250 million for damages. [13]