enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thornton_v_Shoe_Lane...

    The contract has already been made: see Olley v Marlborough Court Ltd [1949] 1 KB 532. The ticket is no more than a voucher or receipt for the money that has been paid (as in the deckchair case, Chapelton v Barry Urban District Council [1940] 1 KB 532) on terms which have been offered and accepted before the ticket is issued.

  3. Hollier v Rambler Motors (AMC) Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollier_v_Rambler_Motors...

    Hollier v Rambler Motors (AMC) Ltd [1971] EWCA Civ 12 is an English contract law case, concerning the incorporation of terms into a contract and the contra proferentum rule of interpretation. It shows an example of a very hostile interpretation of exclusion clauses.

  4. Karsales (Harrow) Ltd v Wallis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karsales_(Harrow)_Ltd_v_Wallis

    Mr. Wallis viewed a used Buick car that was being sold by Stinton for £600. Wallis found the car to be in excellent condition, and agreed that he would buy the car if Stinton would arrange financing through a hire-purchase company. Karsales (Harrow) Ltd. bought the car and sold it to Mutual Finance Ltd., which then finally supplied the car to ...

  5. Wilson v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilson_v_Secretary_of...

    Contract law, ECHR, Right to property Wilson v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2003] UKHL 40 is a United Kingdom human rights , consumer protection and contract law case. It made a decision on the applicability of Protocol 1, Article 1 of the ECHR and some important observations on the relevance of Hansard in litigation.

  6. Car and Universal Finance Co Ltd v Caldwell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Car_and_Universal_Finance...

    Car and Universal Finance Co Ltd v Caldwell [1965] 1 QB 525 is an English contract law case concerning misrepresentation. It holds that an unequivocal act communicating the wish to rescind a contract can override third party rights. The communication does not need to go to the misrepresentor.

  7. Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavendish_Square_Holding...

    Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi [2015] UKSC 67, together with its companion case ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis, are English contract law cases concerning the validity of penalty clauses and (in relation to ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis) the application of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Directive (as implemented in the UK by, at the time, the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts ...

  8. Buy here, pay here - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buy_here,_pay_here

    In the used car market in the United States and Canada, buy here, pay here, often abbreviated as BHPH, refers to a method of running an automobile dealership in which dealers themselves extend credit to purchasers of automobiles. [1] Typically, purchasers of cars at BHPH dealerships have poor credit history, and loans have high interest rates. [1]

  9. McCutcheon v David MacBrayne Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCutcheon_v_David_MacB...

    On 8 October 1960 the MV Lochiel, a ferry operated by David MacBrayne Ltd, struck rocks and sunk between Islay and the mainland resulting in the loss of McCutcheon's car. . Usually David MacBrayne Ltd would have asked its customers to sign a risk note which included conditions for accepting goods for carriage that exempted the company from liability for loss of the goo