enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ergative–absolutive alignment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergative–absolutive...

    The ergative-absolutive alignment is in contrast to nominative–accusative alignment, which is observed in English and most other Indo-European languages, where the single argument of an intransitive verb ("She" in the sentence "She walks") behaves grammatically like the agent of a transitive verb ("She" in the sentence "She finds it") but ...

  3. Morphosyntactic alignment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morphosyntactic_alignment

    In an ergative–absolutive system, S and O are one group and contrast with A. The English language represents a typical nominative–accusative system (accusative for short). The name derived from the nominative and accusative cases. Basque is an ergative–absolutive system (or simply ergative). The name stemmed from the ergative and ...

  4. Active–stative alignment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active–stative_alignment

    In linguistic typology, active–stative alignment (also split intransitive alignment or semantic alignment) is a type of morphosyntactic alignment in which the sole argument ("subject") of an intransitive clause (often symbolized as S) is sometimes marked in the same way as an agent of a transitive verb (that is, like a subject such as "I" or "she" in English) but other times in the same way ...

  5. Split ergativity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Split_ergativity

    In intransitive clauses, the subject can either be represented by a set A-person marker, or a set B-person marker, depending on aspect. In perfective aspect, Chol has ergative–absolutive alignment: the subject of the intransitive verb is expressed by a suffixed person marker, thus in the same way as the object of transitive verbs.

  6. Tripartite alignment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tripartite_alignment

    In linguistic typology, tripartite alignment is a type of morphosyntactic alignment in which the main argument ('subject') of an intransitive verb, the agent argument ('subject') of a transitive verb, and the patient argument ('direct object') of a transitive verb are each treated distinctly in the grammatical system of a language. [1]

  7. Nominative–accusative alignment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominative–accusative...

    An intransitive verb is associated with only one argument, a subject. The different kinds of arguments are usually represented as S , A , and O . S is the sole argument of an intransitive verb, A is the subject (or most agent-like ) argument of a transitive verb, and O is the direct object (or most patient-like ) argument of a transitive verb.

  8. Object (grammar) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object_(grammar)

    The distinction drawn here between ergative and object-deletion verbs is based on the role of the subject. The object of a transitive ergative verb is the subject of the corresponding intransitive ergative verb. With object-deletion verbs, in contrast, the subject is consistent regardless of whether an object is or is not present.

  9. Data quality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_quality

    Data quality refers to the state of qualitative or quantitative pieces of information. There are many definitions of data quality, but data is generally considered high quality if it is "fit for [its] intended uses in operations, decision making and planning".