enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Patentable subject matter in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patentable_subject_matter...

    In October 2005, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued interim guidelines [32] for patent examiners to determine if a given claimed invention meets the statutory requirements of being a useful process, manufacture, composition of matter or machine (35 U.S.C. § 101). These guidelines assert that a process, including a ...

  3. Manual of Patent Examining Procedure - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manual_of_Patent_Examining...

    The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) is published by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for use by patent attorneys and agents and patent examiners. It describes all of the laws and regulations that must be followed in the examination of U.S. patent applications , and articulates their application to an enormous ...

  4. United States patent law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_patent_law

    The "patentability" of inventions (defining the types things that qualify for patent protection) is defined under Sections 100–105. Most notably, section 101 [9] sets out "subject matter" that can be patented; section 102 [10] defines "novelty" and "statutory bars" to patent protection; section 103 [11] requires that an invention to be "non ...

  5. Patentable subject matter - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patentable_subject_matter

    Patentable subject matter in the United States is governed by 35 U.S.C. 101. The two particularly contentious areas, with numerous reversals of prior legislative and judicial decisions, have been computer-based and biological inventions. [9] [10] The US practice of patentable subject matter is very different from that of the European Patent Office.

  6. Utility (patentability requirement) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utility_(patentability...

    Section 2173.05(l) has not been part of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure since the 1990s. The most recent pronouncement of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure is 2107.01: Situations where an invention is found to be "inoperative" and therefore lacking in utility are rare, and rejections maintained solely on this ground by a Federal ...

  7. United States Patent Classification - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Patent...

    The Manual of Classification has the following parts: A list of classes revised in the most recent revision to the Manual and the reason for the revision to each class. A list of the contents of the Manual showing the current page date for each class and the year in which the class was originally established. Overview of the classification system.

  8. USPTO registration examination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USPTO_registration_examination

    The examination is intended to measure the applicant's familiarity with USPTO procedures, ethics rules, federal statutes, and regulations. The applicant is allowed to use an electronic copy of the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) in the computer-based examination (and historically had access to a paper copy of the MPEP for the pencil-and-paper test), but is strictly prohibited from ...

  9. Title 35 of the United States Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_35_of_the_United...

    This may seem expansive, but there are limits to section 101 as outlined in the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. [9] Inventions/discoveries can only be patented once, that is double patenting is prohibited. [9] Only the inventor may be listed as the applicant for a patent. [9]